Reclamation vs. Reusable

There are a number of states that “forbid recycling water,” like this article from the Las Vegas Sun indicates:

Agency opposes water recycling at homes

Return less to Lake Mead, it says, and we’ll get less out

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/apr/13/authority-opposes-recycling-homes/

or, this one from the New York Times:

It’s Now Legal to Catch a Raindrop in Colorado

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/us/29rain.html?_r=2&th&emc=th

These articles point out that as long as we are using gray water or rain water for gardens and washing cars, etc, is just another form of throwing water away. Though there may be a lot of loss in the complete circuit from the home to the municipal waste treatment plant and back to the home, at least there is some water reclamation.

But, that is how RECLAMATION is different from REUSABLE WATER. True "reusable water" is a much smaller loop - one household, for example that uses a portion of its water over and over again.

The Story of Bolinas, CA

There was an excellent report on NPR radio last week. It is about a town in California called Bolinas. Their water supply was so stressed that they limited every household to 150 gallons a day (half the national average) and monitored them daily. There were no excuses: one over-use and there is a big fine; second and the water is turned off!

This is the story for how the townspeople dealt with it.

I recommend listening to the podcast.

View story here.

NH Company makes water last 8 times longer

Hudson, New Hampshire - What if you could take waste water (yes - that stuff) and make 87% of it cleaner than the fresh water you get from your faucet, and then put that cleaned water right back into your incoming supply? One day's worth of water would last for eight days.

Etc etc...